Gartner Responds To Dog Owner's Letter
08 Jun 2006 - ( Editorial )
I am writing in response to the letter from Sonia Howard defending her dog by saying he did not attack! I would like to begin by saying that if the latter is true, I myself must have broken the law by false informing in my statement to the police department because I was there and know what I saw! It was horrifying and I’m not going to explain it again because it has already been explained in recent articles. There should be laws against ignorant people. My mother calmed me on the phone today by saying everyone has a right to freedom of speech, and to let go, LET GOD! Well, I took her advice...kind of! I’ve been doing some research on the net because I have not been able to understand why nothing has been done about the dog, or the owner. Unable to find anything on local laws, I looked for Indiana State Laws and interestingly enough, I found some info the good people of North Manchester might want to know.
The following are State Chapter Laws: A person who knowingly or intentionally harbors a dog that is over the age of six months and not immunized against rabies commits harboring a non-immunized dog, a Class C infraction. However, the offense is a Class B Misdemeanor if the dog causes bodily injury by biting a person.
Fact: Pat’s grandson is showing signs of being permanently scarred from the bite physically and mentally. Unsure if the dog is immunized, but no one seems to know for sure when asked, so I’m assuming not.
Any law enforcement officer or any other person having authority to impound animals who has probable cause to believe there has been a violation of this chapter may take custody of the animal involved.
WOW! This means that after seeing the puncture wounds on the little 5 year old’s back, our local police officer (you know who you are) felt it was not necessary to remove the dog from the home, from our neighborhood. After seeing what I saw that day, I think this is nuts!!
If a dog, without provocation, bites any person who is peaceably conducting himself in any place...the owner of such dog may be held liable for any damages suffered by the person bitten, regardless of the former viciousness of such dog or the owner’s knowledge of such viciousness. An owner of a dog commits a Class C misdemeanor if the owner recklessly, knowingly, or intentionally fails to take reasonable steps to restrain the dog and the dog enters property other than the property of the dog’s owner; and as a result of the failure to restrain the dog, the dog bites or attacks another person resulting in unprovoked bodily injury of the other person.
Fact: This dog darted across the street from his home, without being provoked, attacked a 5 year old child!!!
As a result of this, I’m taking better precautions with my own German Shepherd (yes, I own one also bred by my mother, Constance Ratcliff). It’s a small world, isn’t it? If it had been my dog that had done this to a child, they would not have to do away with her, because I would take her and have her put down myself!! You just never know and it is not something I am going to risk.
Although I do feel this is a sign of an abused animal. This is a woman who’s boyfriend recently got out of jail for hitting her teenage daughter ...FACT, so why should I not believe friends of her family when they tell me he hits Sabbath with his fist and steel toe boots.
I think my point is clear here. After the recent incidents of dog attacks, dog bites, and dogs at large...etc...you’d think that something would be done. I guess I forgot that their hands are tied around here.
I would like to end my letter by saying please take caution to this area, corner of 2nd and Market, because it is unsafe. Just this afternoon, I saw people having to cross to the other side because of Sabbath barking and trying to break free from his chain. I myself, feel that crossing the street will do no good because Mrs. Hammons and her grandkids were on the other side of the street when he attacked the child.
I enjoy my freedom of speech, but I know my son would love his freedom to play in the yard even more, and I know Mrs. Hammons would love to have the freedom of walking with her grandchildren, love to have the freedom of walking with her grandkids without fear of being attacked.
Sincerely,
Missy Gartner